Industrial safety engineering · Oxfordshire & UK-wideDiscuss a project   01865 416840

Collaborative-operation methods

PFL and speed-and-separation monitoring.

Application-led guidance for power and force limiting, contact assessment, protective separation, stopping performance and safety-rated sensing.

Safety laser scanner shown on a white background.

Direct answer

What makes cobot operation collaborative?

It is the way the complete application is designed and used—not a badge on the robot arm. Power and force limiting (PFL) controls defined contact risk. Speed and separation monitoring (SSM) maintains protective separation as people approach. Either method may need physical guarding around tools, processes or trapping points.

Power and force limiting

Assess every credible contact scenario.

PFL cannot be confirmed from the robot data sheet alone. Tool, workpiece, speed, geometry and the way a person could be contacted or trapped all change the result.

Robot, tool and payload

Effective mass, moving parts, sharp edges, protrusions and material retention influence contact severity.

Body region

A credible contact location and the nature of the contact must be identified for the application.

Transient contact

The person can recoil or move away and is not trapped by the application or surroundings.

Quasi-static contact

The person can be clamped or trapped, so force may persist rather than being a brief impact.

Operating envelope

Validated speeds, loads, products, tools and modes define the conditions the safety case actually covers.

Specialist measurement

Where force or pressure testing is required, the scope, equipment, method and competent provider should be agreed before testing.

Oxford Machine Guarding can help define the guarding and safety-integration scope. If calibrated contact measurement or specialist biomechanical assessment is required, this is identified and coordinated within the agreed project boundary rather than assumed.
Safety laser scanner shown on a white background.Monitored approachField geometry must match the actual routes people can take.
Speed and separation monitoring

Protective distance depends on real stopping performance.

SSM uses safety-rated sensing and control functions to respond as a person approaches hazardous robot movement. A design may use warning, reduced-speed and stop zones, but the safe field boundaries depend on the complete response chain.

  • Measured or substantiated robot stopping time and distance
  • Sensor, communication and safety-control response
  • Human approach speed and possible routes
  • Detection capability, intrusion and reach towards hazards
  • Robot movement towards the person during response
  • Installation tolerances, uncertainty, reset and restart
Choosing a concept

One application can combine several measures.

The goal is proportionate risk reduction with usable access—not forcing every hazard into one collaborative-operation method.

See scanners and protective devices
PFLMay support defined close interaction where every credible contact is assessed and the validated operating envelope is controlled.
SSMUses separation and stopping response to prevent a person reaching hazardous movement under the defined conditions.
Hand guidingSupports intentional operator-guided movement where the application and enabling conditions are designed for it.
Safety-rated monitored stopStops hazardous robot movement while a person occupies the collaborative workspace under the defined mode.
Physical guardingRemains effective for sharp, hot, ejecting, trapping or high-energy hazards that should not be accessible.
Evidence pathway

Turn a concept into testable requirements.

A useful specification defines the method, assumptions, safety functions, inputs, limits and evidence before hardware is selected.

01

Analyse

Hazards, tasks, contact and approach scenarios.

02

Specify

Modes, limits, safe states and performance needs.

03

Measure

Stopping performance and any agreed specialist tests.

04

Implement

Guarding, sensing, control logic, reset and restart.

05

Validate

Test the defined functions and record the results.

PFL and SSM FAQs

Short answers to technical search questions.

Power and force limiting is a collaborative-operation method in which contact risk is controlled through the behaviour and characteristics of the complete robot application. The tool, payload, speed, contact geometry, body region and possible trapping all matter; the cobot arm label alone is not evidence that every contact is acceptable.

Define the safety method

Start with the tool, task and human interaction.

Share the robot, payload, application, layout, speeds and access tasks. We will help define an appropriate engineering review.

Black mesh guarding with yellow posts in an industrial building.
Call 01865 416840